<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 115 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18640</link>
    <description>Suo motu revisional power under section 34 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 must be exercised within a reasonable time, and unexplained delay can render the action unsustainable. The Kerala High Court held that a belated initiation of revision nearly eight years after the end of the relevant assessment year was not supported by any material showing acceptable reasons or insurmountable difficulties beyond control. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the notice and consequential revisional proceedings were held barred by limitation and lacking jurisdiction, and the proceedings were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:44:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 115 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18640</link>
      <description>Suo motu revisional power under section 34 of the Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 must be exercised within a reasonable time, and unexplained delay can render the action unsustainable. The Kerala High Court held that a belated initiation of revision nearly eight years after the end of the relevant assessment year was not supported by any material showing acceptable reasons or insurmountable difficulties beyond control. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation, the notice and consequential revisional proceedings were held barred by limitation and lacking jurisdiction, and the proceedings were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>