<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessee and the cross-appeals of the Revenue. It allowed depreciation on non-existing assets, directed verification of subsidies before disallowing depreciation under Section 43(1) Explanation 10, held that MAT provisions were not applicable, and upheld the deletion of disallowance of prior period expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessee and the cross-appeals of the Revenue. It allowed depreciation on non-existing assets, directed verification of subsidies before disallowing depreciation under Section 43(1) Explanation 10, held that MAT provisions were not applicable, and upheld the deletion of disallowance of prior period expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>