https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281549 A writ petition alleging non-consideration of a representation and seeking proceedings against the complainant to disclose the source of alleged funds was not adjudicated on merits because the complaint had already been taken cognizance of and an investigation was pending. In view of the ongoing investigative process, the Court declined to grant the requested relief or direct further action against the third respondent. The writ petition was closed on the basis that the complaint was under investigation and no additional relief was warranted at that stage. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281549 A writ petition alleging non-consideration of a representation and seeking proceedings against the complainant to disclose the source of alleged funds was not adjudicated on merits because the complaint had already been taken cognizance of and an investigation was pending. In view of the ongoing investigative process, the Court declined to grant the requested relief or direct further action against the third respondent. The writ petition was closed on the basis that the complaint was under investigation and no additional relief was warranted at that stage. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281549