<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1637 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The disallowance of expenses was restricted to 30% of the claimed amount, while additions related to alleged bogus sundry creditors and unexplained bank deposits were deleted. The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee on all issues, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:04:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1637 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the Assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The disallowance of expenses was restricted to 30% of the claimed amount, while additions related to alleged bogus sundry creditors and unexplained bank deposits were deleted. The Tribunal found in favor of the Assessee on all issues, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>