<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1651 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, finding that the disclosed income did not meet the criteria of &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and that penalties under this section are discretionary, not mandatory. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of concrete evidence linking the disclosed income to assets or entries discovered during the search to justify the penalty under Section 271AAB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:04:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1651 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, finding that the disclosed income did not meet the criteria of &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and that penalties under this section are discretionary, not mandatory. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of concrete evidence linking the disclosed income to assets or entries discovered during the search to justify the penalty under Section 271AAB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>