<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 112 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18634</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax valuation of shares, a provision for taxation in the balance-sheet cannot be treated as a liability to the extent it already includes advance tax paid; only the unpaid balance remaining on the valuation date may be deducted as a liability. Advance tax already paid cannot be counted twice in the liabilities column for share valuation, so the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 112 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18634</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax valuation of shares, a provision for taxation in the balance-sheet cannot be treated as a liability to the extent it already includes advance tax paid; only the unpaid balance remaining on the valuation date may be deducted as a liability. Advance tax already paid cannot be counted twice in the liabilities column for share valuation, so the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>