<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382028</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the writ petitioner&#039;s objections regarding interest on Input Tax Credit (ITC). The bank was instructed to pay an admitted sum to the Assistant Commissioner of GST. Communications from the respondents to the bank were set aside. The writ petitioner&#039;s points were to be considered, with an option for statutory appeal if needed. The writ was disposed of with specific directions based on a previous order, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1105 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382028</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the writ petitioner&#039;s objections regarding interest on Input Tax Credit (ITC). The bank was instructed to pay an admitted sum to the Assistant Commissioner of GST. Communications from the respondents to the bank were set aside. The writ petitioner&#039;s points were to be considered, with an option for statutory appeal if needed. The writ was disposed of with specific directions based on a previous order, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>