<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1094 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382017</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of boat repairs and maintenance expenditure and the adhoc disallowance of wages paid to boat staff for statistical purposes, remitting the matters back to the CIT(A) for decisions on merits due to procedural violations. However, the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to comply with audit requirements was upheld, as reasons provided were deemed insufficient to justify non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2019 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1094 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382017</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of boat repairs and maintenance expenditure and the adhoc disallowance of wages paid to boat staff for statistical purposes, remitting the matters back to the CIT(A) for decisions on merits due to procedural violations. However, the penalty imposed under section 271B for failure to comply with audit requirements was upheld, as reasons provided were deemed insufficient to justify non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=382017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>