<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Seized Cash Retention Challenged under PMLA: No Section 8(3)(a) Complaint Filed Within 90 Days, Legal Distinctions Highlighted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47395</link>
    <description>Offence under PMLA - retention of the seized cash from the appellant’s office - no complaint under section 8(3)(a) has been filed against appellant within 90 days - Having in possession of proceed of crime and period of investigation on the basis of suspicion are two different situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:29:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Seized Cash Retention Challenged under PMLA: No Section 8(3)(a) Complaint Filed Within 90 Days, Legal Distinctions Highlighted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47395</link>
      <description>Offence under PMLA - retention of the seized cash from the appellant’s office - no complaint under section 8(3)(a) has been filed against appellant within 90 days - Having in possession of proceed of crime and period of investigation on the basis of suspicion are two different situations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 07:29:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>