<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1068 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381991</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC held that the Supreme Court&#039;s directions in Asian Resurfacing, issued in the context of civil and criminal trials, could not be automatically applied to a pending tax appeal. It found that the Revenue had misread that decision and had shown no material ground to disturb the interim stay already operating in favour of the assessee. The request to vacate the interim relief was therefore rejected and the stay was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1068 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381991</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC held that the Supreme Court&#039;s directions in Asian Resurfacing, issued in the context of civil and criminal trials, could not be automatically applied to a pending tax appeal. It found that the Revenue had misread that decision and had shown no material ground to disturb the interim stay already operating in favour of the assessee. The request to vacate the interim relief was therefore rejected and the stay was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>