<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1839 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281537</link>
    <description>A statutory transfer to a reserve fund under section 67 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 was treated as an appropriation of profits rather than a charge to the profit and loss account, so it was not allowable as revenue expenditure. By contrast, breed improvement expenses and co-operative development expenses, incurred to improve productivity, quality, efficiency, and milk supply, were regarded as revenue in nature and allowable on the basis of the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case. The material distinction was between a non-deductible profit appropriation and business expenditure incurred in the ordinary course to enhance operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2019 07:38:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1839 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281537</link>
      <description>A statutory transfer to a reserve fund under section 67 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 was treated as an appropriation of profits rather than a charge to the profit and loss account, so it was not allowable as revenue expenditure. By contrast, breed improvement expenses and co-operative development expenses, incurred to improve productivity, quality, efficiency, and milk supply, were regarded as revenue in nature and allowable on the basis of the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case. The material distinction was between a non-deductible profit appropriation and business expenditure incurred in the ordinary course to enhance operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>