https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281533 A co-operative housing membership disqualification was upheld where Rule 25 was treated as prospective in operation even though it relied on an earlier acquisition of property as the trigger for cessation of membership. The society's bye-laws were held to validly govern continuing eligibility, so a member who later acquired a residential house or plot in Delhi could cease to remain eligible. Ownership in the name of a Hindu Undivided Family did not avoid the disqualification, and the property was found not to be exclusively commercial on the basis of the member's own declarations. The challenge to expulsion therefore failed. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:40:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281533 A co-operative housing membership disqualification was upheld where Rule 25 was treated as prospective in operation even though it relied on an earlier acquisition of property as the trigger for cessation of membership. The society's bye-laws were held to validly govern continuing eligibility, so a member who later acquired a residential house or plot in Delhi could cease to remain eligible. Ownership in the name of a Hindu Undivided Family did not avoid the disqualification, and the property was found not to be exclusively commercial on the basis of the member's own declarations. The challenge to expulsion therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281533