<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1049 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381972</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowance of education expenses incurred at Harward Business School. The tribunal held that the disallowance of expenses did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, as required for the penalty. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified, and the appellant&#039;s grounds of appeal were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1049 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381972</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the disallowance of education expenses incurred at Harward Business School. The tribunal held that the disallowance of expenses did not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, as required for the penalty. Relying on legal interpretations and precedents, the tribunal concluded that the penalty was not justified, and the appellant&#039;s grounds of appeal were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>