<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1046 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381969</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling documentation requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the assessee to provide complete payment evidence for verification and instructed the Assessing Officer to seek an explanation from the builder regarding the purpose of the payments. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential to the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1046 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381969</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of fulfilling documentation requirements for deductions under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the assessee to provide complete payment evidence for verification and instructed the Assessing Officer to seek an explanation from the builder regarding the purpose of the payments. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was deemed consequential to the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>