<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1037 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381960</link>
    <description>The Court partially stayed a public notice regarding a pilot project for an Electronic Cargo Tracking System (ECTS) for goods transiting to Nepal without customs duty payment. The Court emphasized the necessity of Board notifications for procedural changes under Customs Act Section 143AA, questioning the Commissioner&#039;s authority to implement changes without Board involvement. The Court issued an interim order allowing importers to choose between old and new procedures until further orders or August 16, 2019, staying the notice&#039;s operation and directing the Union of India to file an affidavit setting timelines for submissions. The Court kept the maintainability of the writ petition open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1037 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381960</link>
      <description>The Court partially stayed a public notice regarding a pilot project for an Electronic Cargo Tracking System (ECTS) for goods transiting to Nepal without customs duty payment. The Court emphasized the necessity of Board notifications for procedural changes under Customs Act Section 143AA, questioning the Commissioner&#039;s authority to implement changes without Board involvement. The Court issued an interim order allowing importers to choose between old and new procedures until further orders or August 16, 2019, staying the notice&#039;s operation and directing the Union of India to file an affidavit setting timelines for submissions. The Court kept the maintainability of the writ petition open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>