<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1030 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381953</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the ex-parte ad-interim order and the confirmatory order related to the appellant, citing lack of procedural fairness and insufficient evidence linking the appellant to fraudulent activities. The tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice principles and awarded costs to the appellant while rejecting the respondent&#039;s request for a waiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1030 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381953</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the ex-parte ad-interim order and the confirmatory order related to the appellant, citing lack of procedural fairness and insufficient evidence linking the appellant to fraudulent activities. The tribunal emphasized the importance of natural justice principles and awarded costs to the appellant while rejecting the respondent&#039;s request for a waiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>