<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Exercises Extraordinary Jurisdiction to Condone 64-Day Delay Under Articles 226 and 227 Based on Satisfactory Explanation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47383</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay - There is no prohibition for this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution in exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction to condone the said delay of 64 days accepting the satisfactory explanation offered by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:05:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:05:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Exercises Extraordinary Jurisdiction to Condone 64-Day Delay Under Articles 226 and 227 Based on Satisfactory Explanation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47383</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay - There is no prohibition for this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution in exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction to condone the said delay of 64 days accepting the satisfactory explanation offered by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 07:05:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=47383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>