<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281522</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables and the inclusion of another after verifying financials. Emphasizing the proper functional characterization as an ITeS provider, adjustments were made as per DRP&#039;s directions. The appeals were allowed based on these determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 06:53:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281522</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the final set of comparables and the inclusion of another after verifying financials. Emphasizing the proper functional characterization as an ITeS provider, adjustments were made as per DRP&#039;s directions. The appeals were allowed based on these determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>