https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281525 The Bombay HC noted substantial questions of law on whether the CESTAT could reject the appellant's case solely because its CDEC had been cancelled without deciding the merits, and whether compliance with the conditions of Customs Notification 64/88-Cus. remained relevant despite that cancellation and the Supreme Court's direction to decide the matter on merits. The appeal was admitted on those questions, with service waived by the respondent. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2019 06:53:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281525 The Bombay HC noted substantial questions of law on whether the CESTAT could reject the appellant's case solely because its CDEC had been cancelled without deciding the merits, and whether compliance with the conditions of Customs Notification 64/88-Cus. remained relevant despite that cancellation and the Supreme Court's direction to decide the matter on merits. The appeal was admitted on those questions, with service waived by the respondent. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281525