https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281510 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition of undisclosed investment in the construction of a residential house for multiple assessment years, noting nominal differences in valuations, detailed expenditure accounts, and discrepancies in the DVO's valuation. The Tribunal also upheld the estimation of household expenses and dismissed additions for foreign travel expenses, unexplained expenditure, and alleged undisclosed income based on seized material. The appeal for one assessment year was allowed, while appeals for other years were partly allowed. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jun 2019 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281510 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition of undisclosed investment in the construction of a residential house for multiple assessment years, noting nominal differences in valuations, detailed expenditure accounts, and discrepancies in the DVO's valuation. The Tribunal also upheld the estimation of household expenses and dismissed additions for foreign travel expenses, unexplained expenditure, and alleged undisclosed income based on seized material. The appeal for one assessment year was allowed, while appeals for other years were partly allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281510