<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 993 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381916</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the Revenue and the assessee. The case concerning the amortization of premium paid for securities was remanded to the AO for further assessment. The Tribunal upheld the non-applicability of Section 115JB to banking companies and the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A. Additionally, the Tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on income from house property and eliminated the disallowance under Section 36(1)(viii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 993 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381916</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of the Revenue and the assessee. The case concerning the amortization of premium paid for securities was remanded to the AO for further assessment. The Tribunal upheld the non-applicability of Section 115JB to banking companies and the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A. Additionally, the Tribunal modified the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on income from house property and eliminated the disallowance under Section 36(1)(viii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>