<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 968 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered whether an interim stay was warranted against a restraint order blocking access to the securities market and holding office in NDTV, noting that the loan agreements, the allegation of sham transactions, transfer of control, and possible securities law violations required detailed examination; it granted interim protection and stayed the order until the next hearing to preserve the existing position in the interests of shareholders and investors. It also held that, in adjudicatory proceedings, the affected party must be supplied the operative order, and that website upload alone is insufficient; SEBI was directed to furnish a certified copy on application within five working days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 968 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered whether an interim stay was warranted against a restraint order blocking access to the securities market and holding office in NDTV, noting that the loan agreements, the allegation of sham transactions, transfer of control, and possible securities law violations required detailed examination; it granted interim protection and stayed the order until the next hearing to preserve the existing position in the interests of shareholders and investors. It also held that, in adjudicatory proceedings, the affected party must be supplied the operative order, and that website upload alone is insufficient; SEBI was directed to furnish a certified copy on application within five working days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>