<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 962 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Rule 7c of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with Section 70, but upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;10,000 under Section 77(1)(a) for failure to register under the Service Tax within the prescribed time. The appeal was disposed of accordingly on 04/06/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=576001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 962 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and Rule 7c of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 read with Section 70, but upheld the penalty of &amp;amp;8377;10,000 under Section 77(1)(a) for failure to register under the Service Tax within the prescribed time. The appeal was disposed of accordingly on 04/06/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>