<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 959 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381882</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for group insurance can be available as an input service, but where additional premium is charged for coverage of employees&#039; dependent family members, credit may be confined to the employee-related portion. On the facts, the assessee produced evidence that no extra premium was collected for extending the policy to dependants, so there was no basis to apportion the credit. Full CENVAT credit on the group insurance premium was therefore admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:53:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 959 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381882</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for group insurance can be available as an input service, but where additional premium is charged for coverage of employees&#039; dependent family members, credit may be confined to the employee-related portion. On the facts, the assessee produced evidence that no extra premium was collected for extending the policy to dependants, so there was no basis to apportion the credit. Full CENVAT credit on the group insurance premium was therefore admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>