https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381874 The Court dismissed the petition challenging the order by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, emphasizing the availability of the appeal remedy at the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court highlighted the importance of demonstrating failure of natural justice and resulting prejudice to warrant extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227. The judgment underscored the need for a strong case to bypass the appellate process and granted the petitioner liberty to appeal against the impugned orders within a specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381874 The Court dismissed the petition challenging the order by the Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, emphasizing the availability of the appeal remedy at the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court highlighted the importance of demonstrating failure of natural justice and resulting prejudice to warrant extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226/227. The judgment underscored the need for a strong case to bypass the appellate process and granted the petitioner liberty to appeal against the impugned orders within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381874