<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 940 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381863</link>
    <description>The court set aside the assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 due to the lack of independent assessment by the first respondent. Emphasizing the need for the assessing officer to apply their mind independently, the court directed a reevaluation of the assessments in accordance with Narasu&#039;s principle. Despite the petitioner&#039;s non-compliance with objections and document submission, the court mandated fresh notices, allowing objections with supporting documents within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles, disposing of the writ petitions without imposing costs on the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 940 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381863</link>
      <description>The court set aside the assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act 2006 due to the lack of independent assessment by the first respondent. Emphasizing the need for the assessing officer to apply their mind independently, the court directed a reevaluation of the assessments in accordance with Narasu&#039;s principle. Despite the petitioner&#039;s non-compliance with objections and document submission, the court mandated fresh notices, allowing objections with supporting documents within a specified timeframe. The judgment highlighted procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles, disposing of the writ petitions without imposing costs on the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>