<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18597</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand a penalty levy matter for non-compliance with section 274(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the curable nature of procedural defects, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s authority to require prior approval for penalties exceeding specified amounts, and clarified the availability of alternative remedies despite the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner&#039;s dissatisfaction with the remand was deemed unjustified, and the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the arguments lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:50:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 60 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18597</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand a penalty levy matter for non-compliance with section 274(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the curable nature of procedural defects, upheld the Tribunal&#039;s authority to require prior approval for penalties exceeding specified amounts, and clarified the availability of alternative remedies despite the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner&#039;s dissatisfaction with the remand was deemed unjustified, and the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, concluding that the arguments lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>