https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281497 The High Court held that despite the availability of a statutory remedy, a writ petition challenging an order denying cross-examination can be maintainable if it breaches natural justice principles. The court found the denial of cross-examination without reasons as a breach of natural justice, vitiating the order. It emphasized the right to cross-examination in adjudication and set aside the impugned order. The court clarified that the decision does not hinder completing the adjudication process correctly. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, reaffirming the importance of upholding natural justice and procedural fairness. en-us Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 22:06:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281497 The High Court held that despite the availability of a statutory remedy, a writ petition challenging an order denying cross-examination can be maintainable if it breaches natural justice principles. The court found the denial of cross-examination without reasons as a breach of natural justice, vitiating the order. It emphasized the right to cross-examination in adjudication and set aside the impugned order. The court clarified that the decision does not hinder completing the adjudication process correctly. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, reaffirming the importance of upholding natural justice and procedural fairness. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281497