https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281488 The court held that the petitioner (A2) could not be vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as he was not the drawer of the cheque, which was issued by A1 as the proprietor of a company. The court emphasized that personal liability lies on the drawer of the cheque and vicarious liability under Section 141 applies only when the offence is committed by a company. The complaint against A2 was quashed, and the petitions were allowed. en-us Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:14:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281488 The court held that the petitioner (A2) could not be vicariously liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as he was not the drawer of the cheque, which was issued by A1 as the proprietor of a company. The court emphasized that personal liability lies on the drawer of the cheque and vicarious liability under Section 141 applies only when the offence is committed by a company. The complaint against A2 was quashed, and the petitions were allowed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281488