https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281485 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the trial court to proceed with the trial as the High Court's decision to quash the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was deemed invalid. The partner was made an accused, but the company (a partnership firm) was not, contrary to legal precedent. The respondent retains the right to raise additional contentions during the trial. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:54:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281485 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the trial court to proceed with the trial as the High Court's decision to quash the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was deemed invalid. The partner was made an accused, but the company (a partnership firm) was not, contrary to legal precedent. The respondent retains the right to raise additional contentions during the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281485