<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 923 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271AAB is discretionary, emphasizing the importance of considering the facts and circumstances of each case. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty on certain grounds and remanding the issue of penalty on jewellery and silver items to the AO for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 923 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271AAB is discretionary, emphasizing the importance of considering the facts and circumstances of each case. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty on certain grounds and remanding the issue of penalty on jewellery and silver items to the AO for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>