<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 922 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381845</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalty under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act is discretionary, not mandatory. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer must prove that the surrendered income meets the criteria of &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and must adhere to proper notice procedures. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty on surrendered expenditure and instructing a reassessment of the penalty on surrendered jewellery and silver items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 922 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381845</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the penalty under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act is discretionary, not mandatory. It emphasized that the Assessing Officer must prove that the surrendered income meets the criteria of &quot;undisclosed income&quot; and must adhere to proper notice procedures. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty on surrendered expenditure and instructing a reassessment of the penalty on surrendered jewellery and silver items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>