<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 905 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</link>
    <description>Service tax collected but not deposited on the due dates, with interest on delayed payment also remaining unpaid before the show cause notice, justified sustaining the demand, interest and penalties. The finding of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax was upheld on the basis of the delayed and incomplete compliance, and the plea that penalty was barred because tax and interest were paid before notice was rejected. Relief was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 905 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</link>
      <description>Service tax collected but not deposited on the due dates, with interest on delayed payment also remaining unpaid before the show cause notice, justified sustaining the demand, interest and penalties. The finding of suppression of facts with intent to evade tax was upheld on the basis of the delayed and incomplete compliance, and the plea that penalty was barred because tax and interest were paid before notice was rejected. Relief was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>