<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 905 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-In-Original, confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalties should not apply as tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice was dismissed. The Tribunal found the appellant collected but did not timely deposit service tax, supporting allegations of evasion. Both appeals were rejected, with the order pronounced on 18 June 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 905 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-In-Original, confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalties should not apply as tax and interest were paid before the show cause notice was dismissed. The Tribunal found the appellant collected but did not timely deposit service tax, supporting allegations of evasion. Both appeals were rejected, with the order pronounced on 18 June 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>