<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 900 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381823</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed three appeals challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the removal of excisable goods without payment of excise duty. The Court found the absence of contemporaneous records supporting the reprocessing claim and discrepancies in documentation detrimental to the appellants&#039; case. Emphasizing the limited scope of appeal and lack of substantial legal questions, the Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings, ruling against the appellants. No costs were awarded, and the appeals were dismissed based on insufficient evidence and procedural non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 900 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381823</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed three appeals challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on the removal of excisable goods without payment of excise duty. The Court found the absence of contemporaneous records supporting the reprocessing claim and discrepancies in documentation detrimental to the appellants&#039; case. Emphasizing the limited scope of appeal and lack of substantial legal questions, the Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; findings, ruling against the appellants. No costs were awarded, and the appeals were dismissed based on insufficient evidence and procedural non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>