<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1449 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281469</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court addressed the jurisdictional issue concerning the authority of the Additional Directorate General, Central Excise Intelligence to issue show cause notices under the Customs Act, 1962. It highlighted concerns regarding the validity of show cause notices issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence before April 8, 2011. The court postponed the admission of the petition due to a pending matter in the Supreme Court of India, emphasizing that no interim relief had been granted and advising the petitioners to address the validity concern in the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1449 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281469</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court addressed the jurisdictional issue concerning the authority of the Additional Directorate General, Central Excise Intelligence to issue show cause notices under the Customs Act, 1962. It highlighted concerns regarding the validity of show cause notices issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence before April 8, 2011. The court postponed the admission of the petition due to a pending matter in the Supreme Court of India, emphasizing that no interim relief had been granted and advising the petitioners to address the validity concern in the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>