<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 889 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381812</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2007-08. The penalty was imposed based on a trading addition upheld by the ITAT, which was made on an estimated basis without specific evidence linking to the income. The ITAT held that mere confirmation of a trading addition based on estimates does not constitute inaccurate income particulars or concealment. Therefore, the ITAT found no merit in the penalty imposed and directed its deletion, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 15:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 889 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381812</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2007-08. The penalty was imposed based on a trading addition upheld by the ITAT, which was made on an estimated basis without specific evidence linking to the income. The ITAT held that mere confirmation of a trading addition based on estimates does not constitute inaccurate income particulars or concealment. Therefore, the ITAT found no merit in the penalty imposed and directed its deletion, ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>