<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (1) TMI 111 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281448</link>
    <description>After the 1958 amendment deleted the reference provisions in the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, the commentary notes that the saving clause preserved pending proceedings and the forum already seized of them, but not the former machinery for referring bhumidhari issues to the Civil Court; as a procedural change, the deletion applied to pending matters absent contrary intent, so a later reference under the omitted provisions was treated as unauthorised. It also explains that Section 13 of the Court-Fees Act allows refund on remand where the suit was disposed of on a determinative preliminary point, and that this expression is not limited to pure questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (1) TMI 111 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281448</link>
      <description>After the 1958 amendment deleted the reference provisions in the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, the commentary notes that the saving clause preserved pending proceedings and the forum already seized of them, but not the former machinery for referring bhumidhari issues to the Civil Court; as a procedural change, the deletion applied to pending matters absent contrary intent, so a later reference under the omitted provisions was treated as unauthorised. It also explains that Section 13 of the Court-Fees Act allows refund on remand where the suit was disposed of on a determinative preliminary point, and that this expression is not limited to pure questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>