https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281445 The Supreme Court held that the Cooperative Court had jurisdiction under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act to evict a licensee from a flat in a tenant-co-partnership society. However, the Court ruled that the licensee, protected under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act, could not be evicted by the society. Emphasizing the legislative intent to protect licensees from eviction, the Court set aside lower court judgments and dismissed the eviction claim, affirming the appellant's status as a tenant under Section 15A of the Rent Act. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281445 The Supreme Court held that the Cooperative Court had jurisdiction under Section 91(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act to evict a licensee from a flat in a tenant-co-partnership society. However, the Court ruled that the licensee, protected under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act, could not be evicted by the society. Emphasizing the legislative intent to protect licensees from eviction, the Court set aside lower court judgments and dismissed the eviction claim, affirming the appellant's status as a tenant under Section 15A of the Rent Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281445