<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 949 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281444</link>
    <description>The appellate court overturned the Trial Court&#039;s decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000, with Rs. 45,000 as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000 to the State. The judgment highlights the significance of preserving the credibility of cheque transactions and enforcing the legislative objectives of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 11:46:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 949 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281444</link>
      <description>The appellate court overturned the Trial Court&#039;s decision and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000, with Rs. 45,000 as compensation to the complainant and Rs. 5,000 to the State. The judgment highlights the significance of preserving the credibility of cheque transactions and enforcing the legislative objectives of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>