https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281442 The court discharged accused No.5 in a case involving offenses under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of evidence establishing his directorship and specific involvement in the dishonored cheque issue. The petitioner's claims were not substantiated, and the court upheld the trial court's decision. The court emphasized the need for specifying the accused's role and left open the option for the trial court to reconsider the case if new evidence of the accused's involvement emerges in the future. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281442 The court discharged accused No.5 in a case involving offenses under Sections 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of evidence establishing his directorship and specific involvement in the dishonored cheque issue. The petitioner's claims were not substantiated, and the court upheld the trial court's decision. The court emphasized the need for specifying the accused's role and left open the option for the trial court to reconsider the case if new evidence of the accused's involvement emerges in the future. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281442