https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281440 The High Court of Patna dismissed the application to set aside a compromise decree, ruling that the petitioner had authorized his lawyer to act on his behalf and was aware of the settlement proposal without objection. The court found the compromise binding as the petitioner did not oppose it, although he sought an increased settlement amount. Despite the petitioner's delay in filing necessary documents, the court concluded that his lawyer had acted in his best interest, leading to the dismissal of the application to set aside the compromise decree. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281440 The High Court of Patna dismissed the application to set aside a compromise decree, ruling that the petitioner had authorized his lawyer to act on his behalf and was aware of the settlement proposal without objection. The court found the compromise binding as the petitioner did not oppose it, although he sought an increased settlement amount. Despite the petitioner's delay in filing necessary documents, the court concluded that his lawyer had acted in his best interest, leading to the dismissal of the application to set aside the compromise decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281440