<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 885 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381808</link>
    <description>Petitions concerning the alleged human-error omission to carry forward accrued credit in TRAN-1 under the CGST regime were withdrawn, and the court granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue the grievance before the Goods and Services Tax Council. The proceedings were therefore disposed of as withdrawn, leaving the petitioners free to seek redress through the administrative route instead of continuing the writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 885 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381808</link>
      <description>Petitions concerning the alleged human-error omission to carry forward accrued credit in TRAN-1 under the CGST regime were withdrawn, and the court granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue the grievance before the Goods and Services Tax Council. The proceedings were therefore disposed of as withdrawn, leaving the petitioners free to seek redress through the administrative route instead of continuing the writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>