<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 884 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381807</link>
    <description>The Court declined jurisdiction in a case involving the attachment of property for nonpayment of Value Added Tax, citing forum convenience and deeming the Gujarat High Court as the appropriate forum despite arguments for Bombay High Court jurisdiction. The property was attached due to nonpayment by the previous owner in liquidation, with the Court directing maintenance of status-quo on possession and title, granting a four-week continuation of the relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:53:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 884 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381807</link>
      <description>The Court declined jurisdiction in a case involving the attachment of property for nonpayment of Value Added Tax, citing forum convenience and deeming the Gujarat High Court as the appropriate forum despite arguments for Bombay High Court jurisdiction. The property was attached due to nonpayment by the previous owner in liquidation, with the Court directing maintenance of status-quo on possession and title, granting a four-week continuation of the relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>