<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 883 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381806</link>
    <description>The court quashed the attachment of bank accounts by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence due to the absence of a show cause notice, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures. The respondent was allowed to continue with specific seizures under the Customs Act for revenue protection. The court set aside the notice dated August 1, 2018, as modified by subsequent communications, concluding the petition on those terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 883 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381806</link>
      <description>The court quashed the attachment of bank accounts by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence due to the absence of a show cause notice, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures. The respondent was allowed to continue with specific seizures under the Customs Act for revenue protection. The court set aside the notice dated August 1, 2018, as modified by subsequent communications, concluding the petition on those terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>