<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 877 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381800</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned assessment orders against the petitioner, a sole proprietor, due to a violation of Natural Justice Principles (NJP) by the Assessing Authority, which failed to provide a personal hearing. Despite the availability of an alternate remedy, the court exercised writ jurisdiction, citing exceptions for NJP violations. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment, mandating adherence to NJP and previous legal precedents. The court directed the third respondent to conduct a new assessment within a specified timeframe, ensuring the petitioner receives a personal hearing, thus rectifying procedural irregularities in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 877 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381800</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned assessment orders against the petitioner, a sole proprietor, due to a violation of Natural Justice Principles (NJP) by the Assessing Authority, which failed to provide a personal hearing. Despite the availability of an alternate remedy, the court exercised writ jurisdiction, citing exceptions for NJP violations. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment, mandating adherence to NJP and previous legal precedents. The court directed the third respondent to conduct a new assessment within a specified timeframe, ensuring the petitioner receives a personal hearing, thus rectifying procedural irregularities in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>