https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381798 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the lack of a substantial question of law and the appellant's failure to justify the delay in filing the appeal. The application for condonation of delay was rejected as the appellant did not provide a valid explanation for the delay. The Tribunal found that proper communication of the appellate order was made to the appellant, and service of decisions and orders was in accordance with legal provisions. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld its decision to decline condonation of delay based on the appellant's failure to prove sufficient cause for the delay. en-us Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:52:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381798 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the lack of a substantial question of law and the appellant's failure to justify the delay in filing the appeal. The application for condonation of delay was rejected as the appellant did not provide a valid explanation for the delay. The Tribunal found that proper communication of the appellate order was made to the appellant, and service of decisions and orders was in accordance with legal provisions. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld its decision to decline condonation of delay based on the appellant's failure to prove sufficient cause for the delay. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381798