<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 874 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797</link>
    <description>An application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is an enabling and discretionary request for production of documents or things, to be used only when necessary or desirable for the inquiry, trial or other proceeding. That discretion must be exercised judicially, and the refusal to summon documents at the cross-examination stage was not shown to be demonstrably unreasonable where the complainant said the source documents were unavailable. The order rejecting the Section 91 request was treated as interlocutory in character, so revision was not maintainable and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:52:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 874 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797</link>
      <description>An application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is an enabling and discretionary request for production of documents or things, to be used only when necessary or desirable for the inquiry, trial or other proceeding. That discretion must be exercised judicially, and the refusal to summon documents at the cross-examination stage was not shown to be demonstrably unreasonable where the complainant said the source documents were unavailable. The order rejecting the Section 91 request was treated as interlocutory in character, so revision was not maintainable and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>