https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797 The court upheld the rejection of the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C., citing the complainant's inability to produce requested documents. The dismissal of the revision petition was based on the interlocutory nature of the order. The court emphasized the discretionary power to call for essential documents and the importance of establishing a prima facie case. The petitioner was allowed to renew the request after the complainant's cross-examination. en-us Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:52:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797 The court upheld the rejection of the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C., citing the complainant's inability to produce requested documents. The dismissal of the revision petition was based on the interlocutory nature of the order. The court emphasized the discretionary power to call for essential documents and the importance of establishing a prima facie case. The petitioner was allowed to renew the request after the complainant's cross-examination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381797