https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381792 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand against the appellant and its Director, emphasizing the necessity for tangible evidence and thorough investigation to establish clandestine activities. The decision highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and proper examination of various aspects, ultimately allowing both appeals due to insufficient evidence presented by the Department. The appellants' arguments against fines and duty confirmation were considered, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 06:51:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381792 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand against the appellant and its Director, emphasizing the necessity for tangible evidence and thorough investigation to establish clandestine activities. The decision highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and proper examination of various aspects, ultimately allowing both appeals due to insufficient evidence presented by the Department. The appellants' arguments against fines and duty confirmation were considered, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381792