<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of auto cables and battery/ignition cables under Section 4A as parts of automobiles. It restricted the demand to the normal period, rejecting the extended period of limitation and associated penalty under Section 11AC. The case was remanded for recalculating the duty for the normal period, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 860 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of auto cables and battery/ignition cables under Section 4A as parts of automobiles. It restricted the demand to the normal period, rejecting the extended period of limitation and associated penalty under Section 11AC. The case was remanded for recalculating the duty for the normal period, partially allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>