<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381769</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, setting aside the late fee but confirming the waiver of penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act as per section 80 of the Finance Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive penalties, considering the reasonable cause for non-payment due to legal challenges faced by the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 846 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381769</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, setting aside the late fee but confirming the waiver of penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act as per section 80 of the Finance Act. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to waive penalties, considering the reasonable cause for non-payment due to legal challenges faced by the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>